Sunday, November 21, 2010

Is Hate Speech in the Media Directly Affecting our Culture?

Everyone always talks about the "first amendment," and how we all have "freedom of speech." Since we have freedom of speech, people get the idea that saying "anything" is okay since we are allowed to say anything we want. A good example is the article of the Pastor from florida who wanted to burn all the qurans. In his eyes he believed that he was entitled in doing that because of the first amendment. People who do participate in hate speech influence many people in our american culture that it is okay to participate in hate speech. Although we are "allowed" to saw whatever we want, I think it's best to best respectable and not participate in hate speech.

Pastor nixes Quran-burning, claims NYC mosque deal

Terry Jones AP – Pastor Terry Jones of the Dove World Outreach Center speaks to the media as Imam Muhammad Musri of the …
GAINESVILLE, Fla. – The anti-Muslim leader of a tiny Florida church backed off his threat to burn the Quran, defusing an international firestorm Thursday after he said he was promised that a planned Islamic center and mosque would be moved away from New York's ground zero. The imam planning the center, however, quickly denied such a deal.
The Rev. Terry Jones had been under intense pressure to abandon his plan to burn the Quran on Saturday, the ninth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. President Barack Obama urged him to listen to "those better angels" and give up his "stunt," saying it would endanger U.S. troops and give Islamic terrorists a recruiting tool. Defense Secretary Robert Gates took the extraordinary step of calling Jones personally.
Standing outside his 50-member Pentecostal church, the Dover Outreach Center, alongside Imam Muhammad Musri, the president of the Islamic Society of Central Florida, Jones said he relented when Musri assured him that the New York mosque will be moved.
Jones had never invoked the mosque controversy as a reason for his planned protest. He cited his belief that the Quran is evil because it espouses something other than biblical truth and incites radical, violent behavior among Muslims.
But he said Thursday that that he prayed about the decision and concluded that if the mosque was moved, it would be a sign from God to call off the Quran burning.
"We are, of course, now against any other group burning Qurans," Jones said. "We would right now ask no one to burn Qurans. We are absolutely strong on that. It is not the time to do it."
Musri thanked Jones and his church members "for making the decision today to defuse the situation and bring to a positive end what has become the world over a spectacle that no one would benefit from except extremists and terrorists" who would use it to recruit future radicals.
After the news conference, however, Musri told The Associated Press there is no deal to move the mosque. He said there was only an agreement for him and Jones to travel to New York and meet Saturday with the imam overseeing plans to build a mosque near ground zero.
"I told the pastor that I personally believe the mosque should not be there, and I will do everything in my power to make sure it is moved," Musri said. "But there is not any offer from there (New York) that it will be moved. All we have agreed to is a meeting, and I think we would all like to see a peaceful resolution."
In New York, the leader of the Islamic center project, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, said he was surprised by Jones' announcement.
"I am glad that Pastor Jones has decided not to burn any Qurans. However, I have not spoken to Pastor Jones or Imam Musri," Rauf said in a statement. "We are not going to toy with our religion or any other. Nor are we going to barter. We are here to extend our hands to build peace and harmony."
Jones later insisted that he had struck a deal, without suggesting that he would go back to his Quran-burning plan in light of the imams' denials. He said Musri told him that officials would guarantee that the mosque would be moved.
"We are canceling the event because we have agreed, I take him at his word, he has agreed to move the Ground Zero mosque," Jones said. "I verified that three or four times with witnesses. I trust that man who gave me that. I believe he is a man of integrity, a man of his word, I do not believe that he lied to me."
Jones said that if the mosque is not moved, "then I think Islam is a very poor example of religion. I think that would be very pitiful. I do not expect that."
His decision comes after a firestorm of criticism from leaders around the world. The pope and several other Christian leaders were among those urging him to reconsider his plans, which generated a wave of anger and criticism across the Muslim world. In Afghanistan, hundreds of angry Afghans burned an American flag and chanted "Death to the Christians" to protest the planned Quran burning.
The cancellation was welcomed in Gainesville, a city of 125,000 anchored by the sprawling University of Florida campus.
"It's very good news for Gainesvilile and good news for everyone involved," said City Manager Russ Blackburn.
Jones' neighbors also have said they disapprove. At least two dozen Christian churches, Jewish temples and Muslim organizations in the city had mobilized to plan inclusive events, including Quran readings at services, as a counterpoint to Jones' protest.
Jones' Dove Outreach Center is independent of any denomination. It follows the Pentecostal tradition, which teaches that the Holy Spirit can manifest itself in the modern day. Pentecostals often view themselves as engaged in spiritual warfare against satanic forces.
Adding to the confusion Thursday was the sudden injection of Donald Trump into the debate over the New York mosque, which is planned to go up two blocks north of the trade center site.
Opponents argue it is insensitive to families and memories of Sept. 11 victims to build a mosque so close to where Islamic extremists flew planes into the World Trade Center and killed nearly 2,800 people. Proponents support the project as a reflection of religious freedom and diversity and say hatred of Muslims is fueling the opposition.
Trump, who made a fortune in real estate, offered Thursday to buy out a major investor in the real estate partnership that controls the site where the 13-story Islamic center would be built.
In a letter released Thursday by Trump's publicist, Trump told Hisham Elzanaty that he would buy his stake in one of the two lower Manhattan buildings involved in the project for 25 percent more than whatever he paid.
"I am making this offer as a resident of New York and citizen of the United States, not because I think the location is a spectacular one (because it is not), but because it will end a very serious, inflammatory, and highly divisive situation that is destined, in my opinion, to only get worse," the letter said.
Trump also attached a condition to his offer: He said that as part of the deal, the backers of the mosque project would need to promise that any new mosque they constructed would be at least five blocks farther away from the World Trade Center site.
Elzanaty's response: No sale.
"This is just a cheap attempt to get publicity and get in the limelight," said his lawyer, Wolodymyr Starosolsky.
He added that the offer's lack of seriousness was evident in the price.
The group collectively paid $4.8 million for the building Trump offered to buy. The other is being leased.
Starosolsky said the real estate partnership had already received two offers in the ballpark of $20 million.
"He knows what the value of the building is. If he were really interested in buying the building, he would have come forward with at least $20 million," Starosolsky said.
Elzanaty added that he remains committed to the idea of having a mosque built on at least part of the property.
It's unclear how much control Elzanaty has over the property, which is owned by an eight-member investment group led by El-Gamal's real estate company, Soho Properties.
El-Gamal said Soho Properties controls the site, but didn't elaborate. His spokesman said he couldn't answer questions about the investment team or ownership issues.
In a pair of interviews with the AP this week, Elzanaty said he had invested in the site with an intention of making a profit and was willing to half the land for private development, and maybe all of it if a Muslim group doesn't come forward with enough money to build the mosque.

Do media represent realistic images of Arab?

Both my friends are Arabs, and sometimes we sit down to chat about our cultures. I find it very intriguing that a lot of people have their own perception of "Arabs." But to be honest I can't blame the majority of people for having unrealistic views about Arabs, because they are not well educated about the culture. The sad part? When Sept. 11 had occurred I believe the tragedy definitely put a scar in the images of Arab. Instantly our society assumed every middle eastern person they saw was a terrorist. It's already hard enough to see that my best friends suffer through the war between Israel and Palestine. So to see the news portraying the Arab culture as terrorists, or some kind of "weird" religion just because of some are Muslim, is sickening. One of my best friends is not only Arab but a muslim, and one day she decided to wear the head wrap, in order to represent her religion. From the media, Muslim Arabs are seen to be un-ordinary, so for my best friend to go out in public with a hair wrap was shocking to a lot of my friends. I think it's important for other cultures to understand others before jumping to assumptions that certain people are the way they are, just because the media shows the side we expect to see. But then again it's hard for others to learn about other cultures when they don't have any interest in doing so.

Do Media Cause Individuals to develop negative Body Image?

For a long time some may have wondered if the Media does effect our society when it comes to Body images. I strongly agree. Although some may feel absolutely comfortable tin their own skin, others still struggle with securities from what they see on ads, music videos, television and other mass media forms.  One good example is this Dove Commercial Video.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

RA #3 Proposal Outline

Does the Media contribute to Body Dysmorphic Disorder?





People rely on the media in order to be aware of the latest fashions, news and trends that are occurring. Most females can be influenced by commercials, ads, and even radio when it comes to their image. Currently according to the national health publication on image, 56 percent of young females suffer body dysmorphic disorder. That percentage only includes the group of girls who are of the age of 13-18 years old. Imagine the rest.
I noticed with music videos, music artists, models, and even commercials, can portray a certain image for females to look like. For runway models there is requirement in size, and for most designers they prefer double zero. 
Most people still do not understand what body dysmorphic disorder is and may be in denial that the media contributes to it. But body dysymorphic disorder is a body image disease best explained as “A psychiatric disorder characterized by excessive preoccupation with imagined defects in physical appearance,” (medicinenet.com). In order for others to figure out whether or not media is a contribution to body dysmorphic disorder, a person needs to understand the definition of it.

My survey that I plan to construct will consist of questions that will be simple and precise in order to get the answers I need to develop my results. I want to get to the direct point to whether or not does media contribute to not only body image but specifically to body dysmorphic disorder. To see what the media portrays with image intrigues me to find out how far can these ads, commercials and even requirements for image go till society can all agree with each other that “it’s okay to look the way you are.”
I find that body image is a huge struggle for most females especially since physical appearance is what most people are judged on.  And to have the pressure of feeling a certain way in order to feel accepted can cause the issue I’m focusing on, “Body Dysmorphic Disorder.” My survey will mainly focus on all females’ responses but I’ll consider to interviewing some males on their thoughts with this topic.
Based on my research of the age group where body dysmorphic disorder usually occurs, will be the age group that I will focus on. Not only do I want to research and seek the result of the amount of the media that contributes to this order, but I also want to find out how many females feel that they themselves feel that they are a part of the percentage being promoted nationally.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Can Media Regain Public Trust?

The media contributes so much to the public. To think about it most of the information we receive is from the media. Our current events on local incidents, political views, entertainment updates etc. The list literally goes on.  Journalists do their part in finding solid information in order to compose a newspaper that will give the public information. I notice that some people may argue that journalists tend to feed the public the "wrong news" such as the election between Gore and Bush. But in my opinion I do believe that the media can be able to regain the trust of the public because of the work they do. For example, Michael Schudson makes a valid point when he mentions, "News can  do for democracy including information, investigation, analysis, creating social empathy, facilitating a public forum, mobilization, and publicizing a representative democracy," (151). Clearly news (media) provides information. As the media continues to "get in the face of power," (151), I see that it can regain the public's trust. The public wants to hear what's going on all the time. They want to hear what is happening behind doors, the election or whatever that is currently going on. And if it wasn't for journalists, the information wouldn't exist.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Governor Election


The gubernatorial election has been going on for a long time. You might think finding a president is tough, but also finding a governor who is perfect fit can be tougher. I was forced to find out what the election was about when it started in january And I’m glad I looked in to it because I’m on track with the latest updates from San Francisco Chronicle, on the election. The race starts with finding who will represent each party. There is an election to find the right fit for the republicans and the democratic. That process takes awhile since there are many candidates who run.
I noticed that the media was focusing more on the election for the republicans. And if you haven’t noticed, the representative for the republicans is a female, Meg Whitman. Television was bombarded with commercial ads about her and against her. Her opponent Steve Poizner was definitely making a name for himself throughout the media. His committee took advantage of all the opportunities they had to expose Meg Whitman as a bad choice for governor.
Fast forwarding the timeline, Sfgate has a section for politics in which it is not only news articles but a blog that is updated constantly regarding the election. I follow the updates religiously especially I’m intrigued by the way the news is written in these blogs. Currently Jerry Brown is the representative for the democratics, and the woman herself, Meg Whitman is representing the republicans side.
Both candidates are head to head with debates on what they will do for the state of California. In order to win over the people of California, Brown and Whitman spend time promoting their proposals. For example, one of the latest debates is in regard to the California Budget. Brown has an idea, that when elected he would end california’s budget gridlock. This idea is what he endorses through Prop 25. On the other hand, Whitman proposes that when she is elected she will eliminate “40,000 unspecified state jobs and create a two year cap on eligibility for welfare,” and all this according to SFGate.com.
The two candidates are still on a role to prove that he or she is the best fit to be governor. But after all the debates, promotional commercials and campaign, the results come from voters, and after the election is over we will soon find out, “who will be our next governor.”

Will evolving forms of Journalism be an improvement?

News writing takes skills in writing, reading and listening. A good writer knows good material and a good writer knows what bad material is. The entire idea of news writing is to introduce to their audience the current events happening by radio, broadcasting and most importantly to deliver an outstanding newspaper. The cost of having good writers isn’t cheap, as the article mentions “news is expensive; opinion is cheap,” (224). Which brings us to the updated changes in Journalism. Journalism now comes in different forms such as “dialogic formats” rather than being “traditional practices.” Newspapers rather pay less money for writers who can contribute a decent opinion, instead of paying more for writers who can compose a story with in depth content. Journalism is now becoming a business, rather than what it use to be.
The media is where people get their outside information, so it is important material is written well. Having to mix professionals and amateurs together when it comes to writing a newspaper, can display the lack of content within stories. Yes, journalism is evolving but it’s not evolving into an improvement, “So much for new media. But what about old media,” (220).

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

does fake news mislead the public?

Regular news has been around for so long, that I assume viewers don't usually tune into. Viewers are able to get their "real news" in different methods such as internet and newspaper. We tend to view news in those forms because we are able to control the amount of information we "want to know." When it comes to television in general, viewers watch tv in order to find entertainment. Usually, "the real news" would probably not be on the list of entertainment. But drama, suspense and comedy would be entertaining to watch. Such as the comedy show, "the daily show with Jon Stewart," which is confirmed a "comedy show." the shows' audience look forward to collecting information from watching it. Naturally media itself gives us information to learn from. It may or may not be information in which we can use. But as viewers we still choose to watch it because it entertains us. the daily show provides news especially references to politicians, since "most people have very little direct contact with politicians and get most of their political information from the media,"(176). But hoping that viewers understand that "the daily show" is a comedy show, the jokes that are mentioned are easy to understand that it is not "real news." Since being a audience and feeling attached to what we are watching every information will be consumed in results that fake news can mislead the public. Having to depend on a comedy show for information because it's one of the many ways to why we like watching our news, can sometimes give us a misconception of what the real news is all about.


Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Does mass media influence American values?

From my view, I believe that mass media influences the Americans in general to the extreme where it can shape their own values. Thinking about it, Americans feed off of media in a daily lifestyle. For example, we use the radio, internet, and television in everyday routine. Books and newspapers have been the number one contribution to mads media and having opportunity to live in the 21st century we have a wide range of connections to mass media. Now how can mass media shape our American values? the fact that it is naturally involved within our life routines, the material and content that is used within mass media can be persuasive. Such as "manipulation and the packaged consciousness" that Herbert I. Schiller goes through. Mass media comes in different forms in which us as an audience may sometimes not notice we are being manipulated. Take the clothing lines people purchase or music we choose to buy. Mass media connects with their audience (Americans) while trying to cater to their needs. Schiller briefly explains about manipulation "it is essential, therefore, that people who are manipulated believe in the neutrality of their key social institutions," (page 6). basically Mass media influences Americans that we "need" certain things in order to live a "normal" American life. We need the latest technology, and news to feel that we are a part if what's going on.